AI Generated Code
Vibe Coding vs. SBOM: One Builds Fast. The Other Tells You What You Just Built
Explore the clash between "Vibe Coding" and modern software governance. Learn why high-speed AI generation demands stronger SBOM transparency and accountability in 2026 ...
Shift Left Has Shifted Wrong: Why AppSec Teams – Not Developers – Must Lead Security in the Age of AI Coding
Narrow “shift left” has failed at AI scale. Move from developer-led fixes to AppSec-managed automation that triages findings and delivers tested pull-request fixes so teams can safely manage AI-generated code ...
AI Revolution Reshapes CISO Spending for 2026: Security Leaders Prioritize Defense Automation
The cybersecurity landscape is undergoing a fundamental shift as chief information security officers (CISOs) shift their 2026 budgets to artificial intelligence (AI) and realign traditional defense strategies. Nearly 80% of senior security ...
Securing AI-Generated Code in Enterprise Applications: The New Frontier for AppSec Teams
AI-generated code is reshaping software development and introducing new security risks. Organizations must strengthen governance, expand testing and train developers to ensure AI-assisted coding remains secure and compliant ...
DAST vs AI Code: Why Dynamic Application Security Testing Can’t Keep Pace
DAST vs AI Code: TL;DR Traditional DAST requires 8+ hours for comprehensive scanning while AI-generated code deploys 10 times daily. This speed mismatch creates a fundamental security gap: most organizations run DAST ...
What Vibe Coding, MCP, and Slopsquatting Reveal About the Future of AI Development
Join us as we explore the transformative changes in software development and cybersecurity due to AI. We discuss new terminology like ‘vibe coding’ — a novel, behavior-focused development approach, and ‘MCP’ (Model ...
