TPSRM: What It Is — And Why It Matters
Third-party risk management TPRM is a well-established pillar of enterprise security programs. Its focus is on evaluating vendors for financial health, operational resilience, and compliance. As digital ecosystems expanded, so did the attack surface, and TPRM began evolving. Enter Third-Party Cyber Risk Management (TPCRM): a more security-focused framework that assesses the cybersecurity posture of vendors, such as access controls, threat detection capabilities, and data protection protocols.
But even TPCRM has its limits. In a world where attackers target not just companies, but the very software those companies install, a new layer of risk has emerged… one neither TPRM nor TPCRM adequately address. High-profile incidents like SolarWinds and 3CX didn’t stem from weak vendor policies or network misconfigurations, they were delivered through compromised software components.
That’s where Third-Party Software Risk Management (TPSRM) comes in. TPSRM zeroes in on the software itself and the actual binaries, containers, and dependencies being acquired. It introduces direct inspection and validation into the third-party equation, helping organizations verify what’s inside the software they trust and deploy.
TPSRM doesn’t replace TPRM or TPCRM, it completes them. Together, these frameworks form a layered defense:
1. TPRM ensures vendors are reputable
2. TPCRM ensures its systems are secure
3. TPSRM ensures its software is safe
That’s why TPSRM isn’t just a logical next step, it’s an evolution. Here’s why this focused approach to software risk is essential.
Why TPSRM?
While TPCRM emphasizes cyber security controls of third parties such as access management, data protection and threat detection, TPSRM specifically focuses on the risks of software itself, the actual software artifacts the enterprise acquires, integrates and deploys.
This matters because the nature of risk has changed. Today’s attackers are exploiting weaknesses not just in vendor systems but in the very software products and updates organizations consume on a regular basis. Recent examples such as SolarWinds to MOVEit, highlight how deeply software supply chain compromises can penetrate. Malicious code inserted upstream, dependency poisoning and manipulated binaries all bypass traditional perimeter defenses and third-party questionnaires, riding trusted software channels into enterprise environments, almost applying new meaning to “Trojan Horse” in the security world.
The fact of the matter is you can still have perfect vendor governance and still be compromised if the software you are acquiring for your organization isn’t properly validated. TPSRM elevates software – and its components and risks – as a distinct layer of risk that demands direct inspection, control and governance.
TPRM vs TPCRM vs TPSRM
| Role | Area of Focus | Limitation |
| TPRM | Focused on identifying, assessing, and managing the risks associated with using external vendors, suppliers, and partners. | Too broad to detect cyber or software specific threats. |
| TPCRM | Focused on identifying, assessing and managing the cybersecurity risks associated with third-party IT systems, services and infrastructure. | Does not inspect delivered software artifacts. |
| TPSRM | Focused on identifying, assessing, and managing the risks associated with third-party commercial software and components. | Directly addresses risks like supply chain tampering, malware insertion and component vulnerabilities. |
Rest assured, TPSRM does not replace TPRM or TPCRM – it compliments them, bring together a holistic view. Ensuring your partners are trustworthy, their systems secure, and their software is safe.
How Organizations Can Operationalize TPSRM
Managing third-party software risk requires more than contract clauses and self-attestations. It requires technical inspection and validation at the software level… before the software is accepted into your environment.
Only RL Spectra Assure® offers the critical control for TPSRM, delivering:
- Automated software analysis of binaries, VMs, and containers
- Verification of software provenance to detect tampering and manipulation
- Comprehensive component analysis to deliver a comprehensive software bill of materials (SBOM)
- Identify hidden risks like malware, tampering, vulnerabilities, suspicious behaviors, and more
- Continuous monitoring to ensure software integrity over time
By implementing solutions like Spectra Assure, enterprises can begin to treat third-party software as a priority risk, equal to physical security or identity management. This is critical with the new guidelines, such as EO 14028 and the EU DORA, CRA, and NIS2.
Conclusion: Software Due Diligence is a Must
Organizations need to expand their risk frameworks to meet a new reality – organizations need new controls to address growing software supply chain attacks and growing compliance needs.TPSRM offers a clear, actionable path forward. By treating software as a discrete, inspectable risk and by operationalizing validation through technologies such as Spectra Assure, enterprises can regain control and trust in their digital ecosystems.
*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Blog (Main) authored by Patrick Enderby. Read the original post at: https://www.reversinglabs.com/blog/what-is-tpsrm
