Thursday, November 30, 2023

Security Boulevard

The Home of the Security Bloggers Network

Community Chats Webinars Library

Home
Security Bloggers Network
Webinars
Events
- Upcoming Events
- On-Demand Events
Sponsored Content
Chat
Library
Related Sites
Media Kit
About
Sponsor

Analytics
AppSec
CISO
Cloud
DevOps
GRC
Identity
Incident Response
IoT / ICS
Threats / Breaches
More
Humor

Hot Topics

DEF CON 31 - Maxime Clementz’ ‘Defeating VPN Always On’
Holiday Season Cyberattacks: What to Watch Out For
Trend Micro Adds AI Tool While Extending CNAPP Reach
Randall Munroe’s XKCD ‘Decay Modes’
CISA: Threat Groups are Targeting Unitronics PLCs in Water Systems

Application Security Events Security Bloggers Network

Home » Cybersecurity » Application Security » OWASP APPSEC Cali 2018, Jonathan Marcil’s ‘Threat Modeling Toolkit’

OWASP APPSEC Cali 2018, Jonathan Marcil’s ‘Threat Modeling Toolkit’

by Marc Handelman on April 2, 2018

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Infosecurity.US authored by Marc Handelman. Read the original post at: https://www.infosecurity.us/blog/2018/4/2/owasp-appsec-cali-2018-jonathan-marcils-threat-modeling-toolkit

April 2, 2018April 2, 2018 Marc Handelman Application Security, Conferences, Information Security, owasp

← SpyCloud Secures $5 Million in Funding to Eradicate Account Takeover
Cybersecurity approaches to keep PHI safe →

Techstrong TV – Live

Click full-screen to enable volume control

Watch latest episodes and shows

Upcoming Webinars

Dec 07

Improved Patient Experience: What That Means for Your Cybersecurity Posture

December 7 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

Dec 11

How Boundless Software Accelerated Customer Onboarding With Calico Cloud and Amazon EKS

December 11 @ 11:00 am - 12:00 pm

Dec 11

API Security

December 11 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

Dec 14

AWS Immersion Day: Securing Your Infrastructure-as-Code With Snyk and HashiCorp

December 14 @ 1:00 pm - 3:00 pm

Dec 19

Optimizing Application Security Effectiveness – Key Findings From the ESG Report

December 19 @ 9:00 am - 10:00 am

Feb 12

Ransomware

February 12, 2024 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

Mar 11

Securing Open Source

March 11, 2024 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

May 20

Zero-Trust

May 20, 2024 @ 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Most Read on the Boulevard

Okta Screws Up (Yet Again) — ALL Customers’ Data Hacked, not just 1%

Meta Sued for Ignoring its Underage Kids Problem (Because Money)

Security is an Economically Resilient Market: Strategies for Uncertain Times

Small Business Cybersecurity Hampered by Fear of Change, Judgement

UK, South Korea Warn of North Korea Supply-Chain Attacks

A Comprehensive Guide to Software Penetration Testing

SOA VS MICROSERVICES – What’s the difference?

A Comprehensive Guide to Writing a Cyber Security Audit Report

FBI And CISA Warn Of Rhysida Ransomware Threat

The Importance of DevOps Engineers for Your Business

Download Free eBook

7 Must-Read eBooks for Security Professionals

Industry Spotlight

Cybersecurity Featured Industry Spotlight IoT & ICS Security Malware Network Security News Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - X Spotlight Threat Intelligence Threats & Breaches

CISA: Threat Groups are Targeting Unitronics PLCs in Water Systems

November 30, 2023 Jeffrey Burt | 4 hours ago 0

Blockchain Cloud Security Cybersecurity Data Security Digital Currency Featured Industry Spotlight Malware Network Security News Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - X Spotlight Threat Intelligence Threats & Breaches

Black Basta Extortion Group Racks Up $107 Million in Ransom Payments

November 30, 2023 Jeffrey Burt | 6 hours ago 0

Analytics & Intelligence API Security Application Security AppSec Cloud Security Cloud Security Cybersecurity Data Privacy Data Security Deep Fake and Other Social Engineering Tactics DevOps DevSecOps Editorial Calendar Endpoint Featured Governance, Risk & Compliance Humor Identity & Access Identity and Access Management Incident Response Industry Spotlight Insider Threats IOT Mobile Security Most Read This Week Network Security News Popular Post Regulatory Compliance Securing Open Source Securing the Cloud Securing the Edge Security at the Edge Security Awareness Security Boulevard (Original) Social - Facebook Social - LinkedIn Social - X Social Engineering Spotlight Threat Intelligence Threats & Breaches Vulnerabilities Zero-Trust

Okta Screws Up (Yet Again) — ALL Customers’ Data Hacked, not just 1%

November 29, 2023 Richi Jennings | Yesterday 0

Top Stories

Analytics & Intelligence Application Security Cloud Security Cybersecurity Featured Incident Response News Security Boulevard (Original) Social - X Spotlight Threat Intelligence Threats & Breaches Vulnerabilities

Trend Micro Adds AI Tool While Extending CNAPP Reach

November 30, 2023 Michael Vizard | 3 hours ago 0

Cybersecurity Data Privacy Data Security Featured Governance, Risk & Compliance Mobile Security News Security Awareness Security Boulevard (Original) Spotlight

Federal Judge Lets FTC Continue with Restrictions Against Meta

November 29, 2023 Jeffrey Burt | Yesterday 0

Blockchain Cloud Security Cybersecurity Data Privacy Endpoint Featured Malware Network Security News Security Boulevard (Original) Spotlight Threat Intelligence Threats & Breaches

N. Korean Threat Groups Mixing Tactics to Evade Detection

November 29, 2023 Jeffrey Burt | Yesterday 0

Security Humor

Randall Munroe’s XKCD ‘Decay Modes’

Randall Munroe’s XKCD ‘Decay Modes’

Join the Community

Add your blog to Security Bloggers Network
Write for Security Boulevard
Bloggers Meetup and Awards
Ask a Question
Email: [email protected]

Useful Links

About
Media Kit
Sponsor Info
Copyright
TOS
DMCA Compliance Statement
Privacy Policy

Related Sites

Techstrong Group
Cloud Native Now
DevOps.com
Digital CxO
Techstrong Research
Techstrong TV
Techstrong.tv Podcast
DevOps Chat
DevOps Dozen
DevOps TV

Powered by Techstrong Group

Copyright © 2023 Techstrong Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Cloud Workload Resilience PulseMeter

Step 1 of 8

12%

How do you define cloud resiliency for cloud workloads? (Select 3)(Required)

The ability to recover from failures, high loads and cyberattacks.

Continue servicing workload requests during the recovery of failed components or services.

Implementing security measures to protect cloud workloads from cybersecurity threats like DDoS.

Maintaining uninterrupted service in the face of software, infrastructure and network failures or disruptions.

Designing cloud workloads to adapt to sudden changes in demand automatically.

Regularly performing backups to prevent data loss and enable quick recovery in case of failures.

Designing cloud workloads so they can more easily move between cloud locations and service providers.

Using geographically distributed or redundant cloud data centers.

Resiliency is just another marketing buzzword.

In what ways does cloud-native architecture improve the resiliency of workloads deployed in the cloud? (Rank order)

Smaller, self-contained microservices fail independently without impacting overall availability.
Containerized software provides isolation and consistency, making it easier to scale and recover from failure.
Stateless design patterns increase scalability and can fail independently without impacting other parts of cloud applications.
Serverless design pattern allows events to initiate the operation of the discrete functions as needed.
Cloud-native architecture significantly influences the resiliency of cloud-deployed applications.
Cloud-native architecture provides limited or no resiliency improvement.

How important is improving the resiliency of cloud workloads for your organization in 2024? (Select 1)(Required)

The number-one priority

In the top three priorities

In the top 10 priorities

Important but not a priority

Not important

Which of the following do you use to improve the resiliency of cloud workloads? (Select all that apply)(Required)

Containers

Microservices

Container orchestration

Serverless

Multiple cloud providers

Infrastructure-as-code (IaC)

Data distribution or replication

Observability tools based on OpenTelemetry

Failure testing

What factors in cloud-native (microservices) workloads increase resiliency? (Rank order)

Distribute workloads
Portable workloads across multiple cloud providers
Move some workloads to the edge
Kubernetes clusters for failover and load distribution
Stateless software design
Increased security posture
Setting meaningful and achievable resiliency goals

What are the most significant challenges to improving the resiliency of cloud workloads or cloud-native applications? (Select all that apply)(Required)

Lack of skills and knowledge

Legacy or existing architecture of applications

Large amount of technical debt

Multiple or conflicting definitions of resiliency

Inability to gain executive support

Ability to test resiliency without impacting service levels

Insufficient funding

Other

How much of your cloud workload is cloud-native today? (Select 1)(Required)

100% - all cloud-native

Greater than 50%

25-50%

Under 25%

0% - No cloud-native

What is your business or organization's size (# employees)? (Select 1)(Required)

1 - 100

101 - 500

501 - 1000

1001 - 5000

Over 5000

Δ