More on the Security of the 2020 US Election

Last week I signed on to two joint letters about the security of the 2020 election. The first was as one of 59 election security experts, basically saying that while the election seems to have been both secure and accurate (voter suppression notwithstanding), we still need to work to secure our election systems:

We are aware of alarming assertions being made that the 2020 election was “rigged” by exploiting technical vulnerabilities. However, in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent. To our collective knowledge, no credible evidence has been put forth that supports a conclusion that the 2020 election outcome in any state has been altered through technical compromise.

That said, it is imperative that the US continue working to bolster the security of elections against sophisticated adversaries. At a minimum, all states should employ election security practices and mechanisms recommended by experts to increase assurance in election outcomes, such as post-election risk-limiting audits.

The New York Times wrote about the letter.

The second was a more general call for election security measures in the US:

Obviously elections themselves are partisan. But the machinery of them should not be. And the transparent assessment of potential problems or the assessment of allegations of security failure — even when they could affect the outcome of an election — must be free of partisan pressures. Bottom line: election security officials and computer security experts must be able to do their jobs without fear of retribution for finding and publicly stating the truth about the security and integrity of the election.

These pile on to the November 12 statement from Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the other agencies of the Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee. While I’m not sure how they have enough comparative data to claim that “the November 3rd election was the most secure in American history,” they are certainly credible in saying that “there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”

We have a long way to go to secure our election systems from hacking. Details of what to do are known. Getting rid of touch-screen voting machines is important, but baseless claims of fraud don’t help.

*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Schneier on Security authored by Bruce Schneier. Read the original post at: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2020/11/more-on-the-security-of-the-2020-us-election.html

Recent Posts

Phishing Attacks on Your Brand are Unrelenting, AI is the Only Way to Fight Back

When it comes to detecting phishing and social engineering threats, slow response times are detrimental. Automate online brand protection to take…

8 hours ago

Germany’s Anti-Semitic Phonetic Alphabet

Interesting development in Germany to restore phonetics that were erased by the Nazis Before the Nazi dictatorship some Jewish names…

13 hours ago

DEF CON 28 Safe Mode Aerospace Village – Allan Tart’s & Fabian Landis’ ‘Low Cost VHF Receiver’

Many thanks to DEF CON and Conference Speakers for publishing their outstanding presentations; of which, originally appeared at the organization's…

20 hours ago

XKCD ‘Contiguous 41 States’

via the comic delivery system monikered Randall Munroe resident at XKCD! Permalink

21 hours ago

DEF CON 28 Safe Mode Aerospace Village – Matt Gaffney’s ‘MITM: The Mystery In The Middle’

Many thanks to DEF CON and Conference Speakers for publishing their outstanding presentations; of which, originally appeared at the organization's…

22 hours ago

IronNet’s top 10 predictions for 2021

It's December, so you know what that means: Predictions for what's to come for cyber in 2021. We brought together…

2 days ago