In the depths of the American Revolution, George Washington is said to have been asked by an inquiring member of the Press what, amongst all that was then churning around him, most kept him up at night. It wasn’t the Continental Congress, who even then seemed challenged when it came to doing anything productive. Nor was it his troops, freezing and starving to death out at Valley Forge. The answer he gave: “Their spies.”
From that time forward, for over 240 years, we have been amassing what could be considered early indicators, data points, insights indicative of trusted insiders, who were considering turning, or who had actually turned, toward the dark side.
Notwithstanding that long history and growing sophistication, we have, until recently, only ever seemed capable of playing catch up – reacting after the fact to their betrayal. Such was the case shortly after the notorious Ames spy case. As a result of that affair, the FBI and CIA had taken “black eyes” because of a determination that, if they’d only cooperated more, Ames would have been caught sooner, and the damage he inflicted, lessened significantly.
Consequently, President Clinton signed an Executive Order that effectively gave operational ownership of the Agency’s counterespionage efforts to the FBI, inserting two of us, FBI agents, within the organizational structure of the CIA, to go after what we knew was yet another spy.
A new book by reporter Bryan Denson, The Spy’s Son, chronicles those efforts. Under what was considered at best “light cover,” we worked to identify and then capture the highest-ranking CIA officer ever arrested for Espionage – Harold “Jim” Nicholson – an achievement advanced while we were still very much stymied in the world of the “reactive.”
It was from that world of reactive detection (Read more...)
This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog post authored by John McClurg. Read the original post at: Cylance Blog